rhienelleth: (Mercy Kincade)
OMG, things like this make me cranky.


I'm so TIRED of hearing how (insert genre here) isn't Real Art. Hey, whoever you are, you 'discerning reader' who eschews science fiction (or romance, or fantasy, or any other genre) as trash writing - why don't you try writing a book? Then we can see if it meets the criteria you assign to become "art".


EVEN WORSE, are the authors who eschew it!

Guess what? 1984 is science fiction! So is The Handmaid's Tale. And I don't care how often he denies it, Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth books are epic fantasy.

I write fiction that entertains, about characters that, no matter how fantastical the setting, suffer real problems and deep flaws, just like real people. They laugh, they fight, they cry, they embarrass themselves, and yes, sometimes they even have sex! I am never going to apologize for that. I don't care whether or not the masses think it is "artistic". I don't care whether telepathic space pirates ultimately gets shelved in SF/F, or Romance. I just hope a bunch of people end up enjoying the hours they spend reading it.

You know, assuming it someday gets published.
rhienelleth: (mercy1)
Wired talks about the strong women of Battlestar Galactica, and gender equality in SF.

"Battlestar Galactica speaks to a broadening of women's roles in sci-fi that we began to see in the '90s with shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Firefly, which introduced stronger female characters." ~ Professor Sue Brennan of Ohio State, quoted in the article.

Here I go, having thinky thoughts again today. Well, I've actually had these for awhile. I'm just writing them down right now.

This fuels my very strong personal belief that SF as a genre is on the verge of the type of makeover urban fantasy gave the fantasy genre. Women have always read both SF and F, but I don't think anyone can deny that the twin rise in popularity of paranormal romance and urban fantasy - genres which often cross over one another - have pulled in a huge female readership. Fantasy as a whole has benefited from the tidal wave of urban fantasy out there.

SF, IMO, stands on the precipice of the same thing. A scattering of books and series featuring strong SF heroines and romantic subplots have already made appearances in the last few years (Julie Czerneda, S. L. Viehl, Lisanne Norman), but more often than not, SF is still following the same tropes it always has. Fantasy was suffering from the same thing, once upon a time. The huge epic fantasy series used to be my favorite thing to read. Usually weighing in at 600-1000 pages per book, they almost always featured a young boy who would grow up into a powerful wizard/ruler/warrior - any of the above, or all three. Occasionally we saw a young girl instead of a young boy, but not as often. Say what you will, like the books or hate them, but Laurell K. Hamilton's success with Anita Blake came in the wake of TV's Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and soon after that success, others began popping up. I do think that Buffy's success had alittle something to do with it - people who loved Buffy and wanted more of something similar started looking for it, and books like the Anita Blake series were suddenly being passed around or recommended.

Now, urban fantasy very nearly dominates the genre, with bestsellers like LKH, Charlaine Harris, Kim Harrison, Jim Butcher (whose books feature a male protagonist, a switch for the female dominated sub-genre), Kelley Armstrong, Patricia Briggs, Rob Thurman, Carrie Vaughn, Lilllith St. Crow, and a slew of others. There is still room for the old epic fantasy series of yore, but I believe urban fantasy has revitalized the genre and helped draw tons of new readers - many of them female.

You know, back when I was in high school, I was the only girl who played D&D in our gaming group. I read F/SF, played Dungeons and Dragons, and let me tell you, that was a rare, rare thing. for years, the stereotype for the genre has been the nerdy young man who can't get a date, spending all his time reading or game playing in a fantasy environment. The stereotype existed because it was pretty true. Young men reading far outweighed the number of young women. I'm not so sure that's true anymore, and I believe absolutely that SF is headed in the same direction.

Why can't a show like BSG do for SF what Buffy began for Fantasy?

And this isn't rocket science. For decades, Romance has outsold every other genre. Why? Because droves of women buy them every month and read their favorite authors voraciously. Romance features female protagonists - over the years, those protags have gotten stronger and stronger, and it's no secret that women everywhere have a soft spot for a bit of romance. But it does get a little tiring, reading the same stories over and over. Romance started bringing in elements of other genres decades ago. But it's only in the last decade, really, that we've seen romance cross over into other genres on the bookshelves, and even then, there is a fierce battle among some readers as to what classifies as "paranormal romance" or "urban fantasy". But those readers aside, many, many women read both.

Just look at fandom! How many of us are female vs. male? I'd say a lot - 90% of my f-list for sure. And how many of us watch or write fic largely for whatever couple we're currently shipping? *raises hand* Now, imagine all those fans in the bookstore, looking for something that features characters like Kara Thrace, Sharon/Athena/Boomer, Six, or President Roslin?

SF needs what urban fantasy did for fantasy - and I, for one, think it's ready for it. I didn't write Nemesis with that strictly in mind. I wrote it, because that's the sort of thing I want to read.

Things like this article in Wired give me hope that it also might be the sort of thing lots of other people want to read, too. Maybe an agent or editor out there will feel the same way (I really hope!). It's tough to remain hopeful as the economy struggles and doomsday news seems to be cropping up everywhere. I'll take whatever slim carrot I can get.

Epiphanies

Dec. 29th, 2008 11:28 am
rhienelleth: (mercy1)
[livejournal.com profile] sandramcdonald posted today about reading Joe Haldeman's The Forever War. A Hugo and Nebula winning military SF book, written in 1974, it is on most of the SF recommended reading lists I see around the blogosphere, and John Scalzi's more recent Old Man's War is often compared to it.

Having recently read and enjoyed Scalzi, I am no longer sure the comparison is a Good Thing. Sandra points out a couple of problems she had with Haldeman's book, which have guaranteed I will personally never be picking it up to read.

I send you to her journal to read in detail, but suffice it to say, my biggest issue after reading her thoughts and the bits she quotes: female soldiers being forced, by law, to sexually service their male counterparts. Uh, W. T. F.

I used to read a lot of "classic" SF authors. I still love Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game, Robert Heinlein's Friday, and Frank Herbert's Dune, to name a few. But there are others, many, many others, that seem to embrace the Gor philosophy for female characters - their main function being to submit, most often sexually.

Now, I don't consider myself a feminist, but come on. In my teenage years, I used to read SF. It fell into four basic categories:

~ the books I actually really, really enjoyed, like the three listed above, among others

~ those so technically inclined, I didn't make it past the first few chapters. (I like character driven fiction.)

~ those that, though technically SF, read more like fantasy, ie, Anne McCaffrey's Pern books.

~ and those in which the heroine(s) at some point submit to rape and/or slavery (which often included sex) - indeed, it seemed that the entire point of these scenes was to prove that the woman was somehow "for the better" after submitting to this treatment. I don't remember the title or author anymore, but the last one of these I ever read was written by a woman. I was so enraged and disgusted, it turned me off of SF for a very long time.

I didn't realize that until reading Sandra's post today. At the time, I just gravitated more toward fantasy than the SF end of things. That went on for years.

Which brings me to my epiphany. Cut for long ramblings. )
rhienelleth: (gambit-rogue-rain)
There's something kinda slick about simultaneously posting to three different journals. Huh. Go, technology.

So, I picked up and subsequently finished the new SK Dark-Hunter book, Devil May Cry yesterday. It was awesome. Her best book since the one about Val and Tabby where all the bad things happened. And, for the record, I was so totally right in my theory about Katra and who she is! Score!

Spoilers and such )

Farewell

Jul. 28th, 2006 10:51 am
rhienelleth: (illyria grief)
Nononononononononononononononono....David Gemmell dies at 57, much too young, with far too many stories left to tell

No more Druss.  No more Waylander.  No more cool historical fantasy twists with dark heroic characters. 

I discovered Gemmell on a trip to Canada fourteen years ago, before his books were available in the US.  I bought every single title the bookstore had.  He's one of my "must read favorite fantasy authors ever".  His style is unique, his characters powerful.  Words cannot express my sadness.
rhienelleth: (coffee)
ETA: *looks at three LJ cuts showing on journal instead of one*  I also miss my new client for updating.  Because LJ's interface sucks, and it  obviouslt hates me!
rhienelleth: (obi-wan master)
As Mark and his brother are engaged in playing paintball all weekend, I have nothing much to do but housework, catching up on my reading, and writing.

I just finished Julia Quinn's latest, It's In His Kiss, and a fun read it was. I'm going to sad after the next one, as it will be the last of the Bridgerton siblings, and probably the last Bridgerton book. It put me in a regency romance mood, so I ventured out to Starbucks this morning (lamenting the fact that I don't have my new espresso machine yet, and so had to venture out) and then on to Borders, where I picked up Victoria Alexander's latest. It's good, but not as good as Quinn's, and after an hour and a half, I'm regency-d out for the day.

So where does that leave me? Well, as the sky appears to be clearing, out on my deck nursing the last of my grande caramle macchiato and writing on S&S. I have the Batman Begins score playing in the CD player for appropriate mood music. It's going well.

Very gratifying indeed, even if I haven't touched the housework yet.

Profile

rhienelleth: (Default)
rhienelleth

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21222324252627
2829     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 26th, 2026 07:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios